[rfc-i] RFC Editor structure

Thomas Narten narten at us.ibm.com
Wed Sep 10 05:46:10 PDT 2008

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis at gmail.com> writes:

> Actually, I DO remember how it used to be, first with Jon and then
> with Joyce. I think Jon was a unique individual, who had the ability
> to act as an largely autonomous expert, and Joyce, to a lesser extent,
> also had an excellent understanding of "what was right" for the RFC
> series. However, I really do think that those days are behind us, and
> the community really DOES want process in place where RFC content
> updates and publication decisions (no matter how minor) are completely
> transparent and open to public comment.

I think this is a large part of it. The world has changed
significantly. And there is plenty of evidence that nowadays when
someone doesn't like a decision that has been made, they complain
and/or file appeals. That has a way of changing the dynamics of what
people are willing to do "just because it is obviously right", since
"obvious" is in the eye of the beholder.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list