[rfc-i] insufficient engagement on draft-iab-rfc-editor-model-00
dhc2 at dcrocker.net
Tue Oct 21 11:02:20 PDT 2008
Bob Braden wrote:
> Straightforward, maybe, but not painless for the contractor, and therefore,
> not painless for the quality of RFC publication service you can expect.
Since the contractor has been operating in their current role for a very, very
long time, and much of that time has had formal arrangements that were far more
tentative, why is a two-year contract renewal a problem at this particular time?
More substantive resolution would of course be better, but how is an extension a
More information about the rfc-interest