[rfc-i] citing historic internet drafts

Bob Braden braden at ISI.EDU
Thu Oct 16 14:24:14 PDT 2008


  *> As a concrete suggestion I'd change the boilerplate to say:
  *> 
  *> ...inappropriate to cite Internet-Drafts other than as "work in
  *> progress", or for work no longer in progress, "unpublished working draft".
  *> 
  *> And I certainly agree that it should not require this much discussion to
  *> fix the problem. 
  *> 
  *> Keith
  *> 

Keith,

That seems to violate the time-invariance of RFCs.

Bob Braden


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list