[rfc-i] citing historic internet drafts
braden at ISI.EDU
Thu Oct 16 14:24:14 PDT 2008
*> As a concrete suggestion I'd change the boilerplate to say:
*> ...inappropriate to cite Internet-Drafts other than as "work in
*> progress", or for work no longer in progress, "unpublished working draft".
*> And I certainly agree that it should not require this much discussion to
*> fix the problem.
That seems to violate the time-invariance of RFCs.
More information about the rfc-interest