[rfc-i] citing historic internet drafts
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu Oct 16 04:12:30 PDT 2008
Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> I don't see why that precludes having a citation for a draft which adds
> the note '(Historic work in progress, 2013)', or 'Historic (2013) work in
> progress'. Not a lie, and a helpful characterization. No?
Adding that annotation would certainly improve things -- right now I'm
waiting for the RFC Editor's feedback about what exactly they would be
willing to approve.
More information about the rfc-interest