[rfc-i] citing historic internet drafts

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Tue Oct 14 13:12:03 PDT 2008


Hi,

sometimes an RFC needs to (non-normatively) cite an expired internet 
draft. For instance, because

- the draft was a WG work item, but an individual took over after the WG 
abandoned that draft, or

- the draft was abandoned, but still contains useful historic 
information relevant to the RFC (such as a requirements document that 
never made it to RFC).

I hear from the RFC Editor that the current policy is:

       Non-normative references to Internet Drafts are allowed, but they
       must take the following restricted form: the author(s), the title,
       the phrase "Work in Progress", and the date; for example:

                [doe13] Doe, J., "The Deployment of IPv6",
                        Work in Progress, May 2013. -- 
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/rfc-style-manual-08.txt>

Of course that is totally misleading if the draft in fact is *not* work 
in progress, such as in the cases above.

It seems that an accurate and useful citation would be:

                [doe13] Doe, J., "The Deployment of IPv6",
                        "abandoned work", May 2013, <...URL...>.

...potentially augmented with an annotation explaining the citation 
("work on this internet draft didn't complete, but it still contains 
useful historic information, because of...").

Feedback appreciated,

Julian


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list