[rfc-i] Data point [Re: Fwd:I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-03.txt]
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Tue Oct 7 12:34:02 PDT 2008
Joe Touch wrote:
>>> UTF-8 that doesn't preserve page breaks and line breaks isn't a step
>>> forward. IMO, they're all required.
>> I don't think anybody was proposing a UTF-8 based format that breaks
>> these requirements. That the current draft forbids form feeds was an
>> oversight (I think).
> I'm assuming that draft-hoffman allows these characters. I'm NOT
> claiming we can't "allow" all three; I'm claiming I don't have a print
> path that supports all three on Vista.
>>>> If you can't make those work with ASCII, you won't be able to
>>>> do it with UTF-8 either.
>>> They all work with ASCII, but I can't make them work with UTF-8. That is
>>> the problem...
>> I already suggested that using a BOM will fix most issues on Windows
>> once the HTTP resource is saved to the local file system.
>> BR, Julian
> I tried that - the BOM is there. Now open the file with a Windows app
> and view it and try to print it - show me any app that preserves all
> three properties above. Wordpad (which works for ASCII, FF, LF) isn't it.
I just tried the plain ASCII version in Wordpad, and it doesn't work at
all for me. Not sure why.
On the other hand,
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-03> works fine in my
browser, and does print. And it will still print when it contains
More information about the rfc-interest