[rfc-i] Data point [Re: Fwd:I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-03.txt]
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Tue Oct 7 09:36:25 PDT 2008
Joe Touch wrote:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> At this point I'm really not sure what your point is.
>> - LF as a line separator is a problem in Windows? Agreed.
>> - It's hard to enter formfeed characters in Windows editors? Agreed.
>> But this applies to both ASCII and UTF-8.
>> (These problems go away as soon as the author chooses one of the tools
>> we have for the job)
> Sure. *IF* we have those tools.
> Understood that right now I have different tools for writing (Word),
> reading (Wordpad), and printing (Wordpad).
> The trick with UTF-8 is I have not identified a tool for writing them
> (other than editing source [xml2rfc] - which is nearly as antiquated as
> ASCII). I have not identified a tool for printing them that preserves
Actually, xml2rfc works very well. I guess it's a matter of taste.
You're the expect on Word (here). Are you saying that you can use it to
generate ASCII, but not UTF-8?
> page boundaries.
Navigate to tools.ietf.org, and print the HTML version from a browser.
> Those two seem like showstoppers.
I still don't understand how the problems you reported are different for
More information about the rfc-interest