[rfc-i] Data point [Re: Fwd:I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-03.txt]
duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Mon Oct 6 23:12:01 PDT 2008
I'm confused. I don't think Paul's example document uses anything
other than ASCII FFs. There is no character in Unicode (other than
"ASCII FF") with a sematics or usage that gets close to FF.
(The reason for this is that with today's hardware, software, and
document architectures, FF is in many ways really quite outdated.)
So are you saying that we have software that understands FF,
and software that understands (non-ASCII) UTF-8, but that the
intersection of these two is empty? Or something else?
At 14:49 08/10/07, Joe Touch wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>This conversation convinces me that - as with the US election debates -
>people see what they already believe.
>Dave and I see that tools we expect to work and use daily fail on UTF-8.
>You see tools you expect to work and use daily succeed on UTF-8.
>At some point, if a change is made, everyone is going to have to go
>around debugging everything, which is admittedly what we continue to do
>for things we need to work (e.g., formfeed).
>I can see some workarounds for various things, and some things won't
>work anymore, period. Most of this we can eventually adapt to.
>The key missing component appears to be formfeed, though. We have extant
>examples of ways to print RFCs that understand FFs. Does anyone have one
>that understands unicode FFs? And if we don't, is there a path forward?
>(yes, I can generate them in Wordpad, but it doesn't interpret them
>correctly, like it does with ASCII FFs - which can be seen in print preview)
#-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
More information about the rfc-interest