[rfc-i] New version: draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-04.txt

Joe Touch touch at ISI.EDU
Thu Nov 6 09:11:36 PST 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Julian Reschke wrote:
...
> I would support moving to a well-defined XHTML profile as well. That 
> being said, I just don't see how to get there, if we can't even get away 
> from plain ASCII.

Incrementally, using the new format as alternate at first would be a
good, *non-invasive* way to test the transition without impacting the
process prematurely.

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkTJUgACgkQE5f5cImnZrvDpgCgu9ZLYFAWQYDVACsobtBTtQWt
x/wAn2O5FrM3bUFf5yiXjhSPMYw5wEUX
=E55e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list