[rfc-i] Errata report system nit

[RFC Editor]

Hi Frank,

Thank you for bringing this error to our attention.  You are correct,
the RFC Editor is the responsible verifying party for this document.
We have updated our database.

Thank you!

Sandy

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 04:40:38AM +0200, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Hi, for RFC 3092 the errata report system picked the IESG
> as responsible party, I think it should be the RFC editor
> for April 1st RFCs such as RFC 3092.
> 
>  Frank
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest