[rfc-i] New queue file
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Fri Jun 6 18:15:16 PDT 2008
Bob Braden wrote:
> The confusion arose in the Informational/Experimental grouping...
> it grouped IETF and independent submissions together.
You could drop IETF WG vs. IETF non-WG if you want KISS, the
name usually indicates draft-ietf-wg-... vs. draft-non-wg-...
Just an idea. If you keep queue2.html as is I'm not sure that
draft-shimaoka-multidomain-pki-13.txt belongs into an IETF WG
> Screen-scrapers beware.
They should use your XML version, that's why you've created it.
More information about the rfc-interest