[rfc-i] references vs front matter
housley at vigilsec.com
Tue Jan 29 12:02:59 PST 2008
If the IESG approves the document, we insist on a section that
describes the differences between the two RFCs. That provides the
linkage that you are seeking.
At 05:11 AM 1/29/2008, Julian Reschke wrote:
>here's a simple question:
>Let's say RFC YYYY obsoletes RFC XXXX, and says so on the front page.
>However, RFC XXXX isn't mentioned anywhere else throughout the text.
>Should it still contain an Informative Reference to RFC XXXX? I would
>think so, but the RFC-Editor seems to disagree.
>rfc-interest mailing list
>rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
More information about the rfc-interest