[rfc-i] comments on draft-rfc-editor-errata-process-00
henrik at levkowetz.com
Mon Jan 21 19:10:56 PST 2008
On 2008-01-21 23:09 Danny McPherson said the following:
> On Dec 4, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Turner, Sean P. wrote:
>> 3. I know RFCs never change, but with errata they kind of do - so
>> should we add a link/note in to the boilerplate either at the
>> beginning or at the end of the RFC.
> This is somewhat akin to what BRC suggested and W3C employs today,
> as outlined in the text in Appendix A.
> 1. Brian Carpenter has suggested an approach similar to that
> used by
> W3C: Add a URL to every published RFC that points to its errata
> (if any).
> For W3C examples, see:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/ and
> They include the text:
> "Please refer to the <errata> for this document, which may
> include some normative corrections."
> where <errata> is a hyperlink to the list of all errata or a
> page that says:
> "There are no errata to this document yet."
> Similarly, a URL could be added to all (future) RFCs pointing to
> where the relevant errata are posted.
An example of how this could look is the errata link which exists for
all RFCs with errata in their htmlized form at http://tools.ietf.org/html/,
e.g., http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4954 -- see the top right-hand corner
of the added header, under the standard-level indication.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20080122/dcb0bcab/signature.bin
More information about the rfc-interest