[rfc-i] Fwd: Comment on headers-and-boilerplates
sm at resistor.net
Fri Dec 12 13:23:53 PST 2008
At 03:09 12-12-2008, Olaf Kolkman wrote:
>I have see comments going both ways, folk that introduced the question
>are strongly for adding language that the non-ietf-streams are non-
>ietf-streams, folk that replied later are all saying, don't say non-
>ietf-stream, as that makes as much sense as saying non-ieee-document.
We cannot even agree on what the IETF is and now we expect readers to
know what the IETF stream is. Can we drop the word "stream"?
More information about the rfc-interest