[rfc-i] Fwd: Comment on headers-and-boilerplates

SM sm at resistor.net
Fri Dec 12 13:23:53 PST 2008


At 03:09 12-12-2008, Olaf Kolkman wrote:
>I have see comments going both ways, folk that introduced the question
>are strongly for adding language that the non-ietf-streams are non- 
>ietf-streams, folk that replied later are all saying, don't say non- 
>ietf-stream, as that makes as much sense as saying non-ieee-document.

We cannot even agree on what the IETF is and now we expect readers to 
know what the IETF stream is.  Can we drop the word "stream"?

Regards,
-sm 



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list