[rfc-i] Some questions about the RFC Editor restructuring plan
Brian E Carpenter
brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Fri Aug 8 13:45:10 PDT 2008
In my copy of 4846 that is the title of section 6.
On 2008-08-09 06:18, Bob Braden wrote:
> *> IMHO there is only a partial correspondence, because an independent
> *> peer review process is needed only for the Independent Stream. So I
> *> think there is a strong analogy between the "RFC Reviewing Editor"
> *> and an academic editor-in-chief, and between the RFC "Editorial Review
> *> Board" [RFC4846] and an academic editorial board, *but* the analogies
> I am trying to understand what you are saying. Looking at RFC 4846, I
> do not find the term "Editorial Review Board". Am I (or grep ;-))
> missing something?
> Bob Braden
> *> only apply to the Independent Stream.
> *> Brian
More information about the rfc-interest