[rfc-i] Some questions about the RFC Editor restructuring plan

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Fri Aug 8 13:45:10 PDT 2008


Bob,

In my copy of 4846 that is the title of section 6.

    Brian

On 2008-08-09 06:18, Bob Braden wrote:
>   *> 
>   *> IMHO there is only a partial correspondence, because an independent
>   *> peer review process is needed only for the Independent Stream. So I
>   *> think there is a strong analogy between the "RFC Reviewing Editor"
>   *> and an academic editor-in-chief, and between the RFC "Editorial Review
>   *> Board" [RFC4846] and an academic editorial board, *but* the analogies
> 
> Brian,
> 
> I am trying to understand what you are saying.  Looking at RFC 4846, I
> do not find the term "Editorial Review Board".  Am I (or grep ;-))
> missing something?
> 
> Bob Braden
> 
>   *> only apply to the Independent Stream.
>   *> 
>   *>     Brian
>   *> 
> 


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list