[rfc-i] Some questions about the RFC Editor restructuring plan

Bob Braden braden at ISI.EDU
Thu Aug 7 15:25:31 PDT 2008

  *>  From then on, the author(s) interact with the production part of the  
  *> process. For each journal, that tends to be one person, so that  
  *> there's a fair amount of consistency. Typically, they get a "proof"  
  *> back from the production side and can then mark it up, kind of like  
  *> AUTH48. Unlike during AUTH48, associate editors don't worry so much  
  *> about authors "sneaking in" changes...

Do the markups go back to the authors to make corrections, or ...?

AUTH48 happens generally after a good deal of editing for English
grammar, consistency, etc.  Maybe the articles that make it to the
copy editors are more consistently well formed than the average
Internet Draft?


  *> Henning
  *> On Aug 7, 2008, at 4:52 PM, Bob Braden wrote:


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list