[rfc-i] comments on draft-rfc-editor-errata-process-00

Turner, Sean P. turners at ieca.com
Tue Dec 4 11:58:22 PST 2007


Three comments on the draft/process:
 
1. Should we add a link to the errata on the
http://www.ietf.org/iesg/1rfc_index.txt page? This way if somebody does
download the index and do a search on it then it's pretty clear that there's
errata.

2. Likewise should we add a link on the WG pages?

3. I know RFCs never change, but with errata they kind of do - so should we
add a link/note in to the boilerplate either at the beginning or at the end
of the RFC.

I know this is operator error but I really had no idea there was errata
until about 6 months ago.

spt

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20071204/7feb9114/attachment.html


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list