[rfc-i] 3597 / 4034 (was: 3987)
nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
Tue Sep 13 17:33:16 PDT 2005
Peter Koch wrote:
> it's a bug in both cases, although one that doesn't hurt.
Thanks for info - I was a bit worried about the "case
canonicalization" effects for SPF vs. TXT. At the moment
there's a "MUST be identical" in the SPF spec., and it's
"case-sensitive" (for SPF's uppercased macro letters).
> he'll probably be able to deal with the double HINFO
> (and MD/MF).
More information about the rfc-interest