[rfc-i] independent submissions to RFC Editor
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu Jan 13 01:59:01 PST 2005
Bob Braden wrote:
> *> From a procedural point of view it would be nice if ID's that are in
> *> the RFC Editor's queue would not expire after 6 months (do they right now?).
> The Secretariat is not supposed to expire I-Ds that are in the RFC
> Editor queue. That's the theory... what the practice is, we are
I just checked with the top entries from
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html>, section "INDEPENDENT SUBMISSIONS
UNDER RFC EDITOR REVIEW", and sure enough, they all seem to have expired.
Furthermore, there seems to be an unfortunate disconnect between the
queue and the IETF's p.o.v., for instance,
H. Haverinen, Ed., J. Salowey, Ed.
Extensible Authentication Protocol Method for GSM Subscriber Identity
while the IETF says:
<id name="draft-haverinen-pppext-eap-sim-16" date="2004-12-27"
(home-made XML format of
So the document has been revised three times, and has been submitted to
the IESG for publication). At a minimum this means that the RFC Editor
Queue needs some systematic cleanup and may in fact be not as long as it
Best regards, Julian
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
More information about the rfc-interest