[rfc-i] ABNF (RFC2234)

Bill Fenner fenner at research.att.com
Tue Feb 22 11:27:29 PST 2005


>Somebody (one of 2234's authors) should probably instruct the RFC Editor
>to elide the "erratum" which purports to change the technical content of
>2234...

Somehow in all this time I've managed to miss that the first errata
entry changes the definition of prose-val.  I always thought that it
just added the missing semicolons.  This is indeed incorrect, and
even if we're going to make this change, adding c-wsp makes the
grammar ambiguous so I'm not a fan.

  Bill


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list