[rfc-i] ABNF (RFC2234) vs HTTP's augmented BNF syntax (RFC822
dhc2 at dcrocker.net
Sat Feb 12 14:39:27 PST 2005
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:46:11 +0100, Julian Reschke wrote:
> I think you're missing that the "#rule" (not mine, btw :-) also allows
> commas in the list production, thus
This notation was in the RFC822 version of ABNF.
The DRUMS working group decided to drop it.
The decision wasn't make lightly.
Unfortunately, I am not remembering the arguments about it. Perhaps someone else on the list will.
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
More information about the rfc-interest