[rfc-i] ABNF (RFC2234)
shollenbeck at verisign.com
Wed Apr 6 04:02:16 PDT 2005
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org
> [mailto:rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Lilly
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 7:32 PM
> To: rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> Subject: Re: [rfc-i] ABNF (RFC2234)
> > Date: 2005-04-03 21:17
> > From: Bob Braden <braden at isi.edu>
> > *> Somebody (one of 2234's authors) should probably
> instruct the RFC Editor
> > *> to elide the "erratum" which purports to change the
> technical content of
> > *> 2234...
> > I must admit to having lost track of this discussion. Is the above
> > statement correct, oh wise people? If so, will someone
> tell us exactly
> > what to put in the erratum?
> My opinion, based on the discussion, but with the caveat that I am
> neither one of the RFC's authors nor one of the cognizant Area
> Directors, is that there are two parts of the first erratum message
> which are objectionable:
> 1. " / c-wsp"
> 2. ", possibly multiline"
...and with the recent IESG approval of draft-crocker-abnf-rfc2234bis (which obsoletes RFC 2234), the erratum for RFC 2234 become irrelevent.
More information about the rfc-interest