[rfc-i] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-rfc-author-guide-00.txt

[Julian Reschke]

Alex Rousskov wrote:

> ...
> Thanks for clarifying my doubts! I believe the approach you are 
> documenting is fundamentally wrong in IETF context. IMHO, RFC Editor 
> SHOULD NOT accept drafts that require modifications. Nor should IESG 
> review such drafts, for that matter. It should be authors responsibility 
> to comply with all the rules, without spending precious IETF resources. 
> And RFC Editor and IESG should be prohibited from wasting time on fixing 
> drafts to comply with the rules.
 > ...

+1

Julian