[rfc-i] bibliographic listing of RFCs

Henning Schulzrinne hgs at cs.columbia.edu
Thu Jul 29 10:44:53 PDT 2004


Why shouldn't authors be listed? It's not like they haven't contributed 
and the usual motivation (space constraints in paper publications) 
doesn't apply here.

Paul Hoffman / VPNC wrote:
> At 9:11 PM -0700 7/28/04, Aaron Falk wrote:
> 
>> We've put together a listing of bibliographic entries for RFCs in the 
>> format preferred by the RFC Editor.
> 
> 
> Looks great. One editorial question: why do you prefer listing all 
> authors instead of the first author plus "et. al." for lists greater 
> than two? The latter seems to be more popular these days.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list