[rfc-dist] BCP 150, RFC 5597 on Network Address Translation (NAT) Behavioral Requirements for the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
Thu Sep 17 16:08:49 PDT 2009
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
BCP 150
RFC 5597
Title: Network Address Translation (NAT) Behavioral
Requirements for the Datagram Congestion Control
Protocol
Author: R. Denis-Courmont
Status: Best Current Practice
Date: September 2009
Mailbox: rem at videolan.org
Pages: 9
Characters: 18933
See Also: BCP00150
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-behave-dccp-05.txt
URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5597.txt
This document defines a set of requirements for NATs handling the
Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP). These requirements
allow DCCP applications, such as streaming applications, to operate
consistently, and they are very similar to the TCP requirements for
NATs, which have already been published by the IETF. Ensuring that
NATs meet this set of requirements will greatly increase the
likelihood that applications using DCCP will function properly. This
document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements.
This document is a product of the Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance Working Group of the IETF.
BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute
More information about the rfc-dist
mailing list