[rfc-dist] RFC 5392 on OSPF Extensions in Support of Inter-Autonomous System (AS) MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering
rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
Wed Jan 14 14:59:14 PST 2009
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
Title: OSPF Extensions in Support of
Inter-Autonomous System (AS) MPLS and GMPLS
Author: M. Chen, R. Zhang, X. Duan
Status: Standards Track
Date: January 2009
Mailbox: mach at huawei.com,
zhangrenhai at huawei.com,
duanxiaodong at chinamobile.com
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-06.txt
This document describes extensions to the OSPF version 2 and 3
protocols to support Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and
Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE) for multiple
Autonomous Systems (ASes). OSPF-TE v2 and v3 extensions are defined
for the flooding of TE information about inter-AS links that can be
used to perform inter-AS TE path computation.
No support for flooding information from within one AS to another AS
is proposed or defined in this document. [STANDARDS TRACK]
This document is a product of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute
More information about the rfc-dist