[rfc-dist] RFC 5401 on Multicast Negative-Acknowledgment (NACK) Building Blocks
rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
Wed Nov 26 14:18:19 PST 2008
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
Title: Multicast Negative-Acknowledgment (NACK) Building
Author: B. Adamson, C. Bormann,
M. Handley, J. Macker
Status: Standards Track
Date: November 2008
Mailbox: adamson at itd.nrl.navy.mil,
cabo at tzi.org,
M.Handley at cs.ucl.ac.uk,
macker at itd.nrl.navy.mil
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-rmt-bb-norm-revised-07.txt
This document discusses the creation of reliable multicast protocols
that utilize negative-acknowledgment (NACK) feedback. The rationale
for protocol design goals and assumptions are presented. Technical
challenges for NACK-based (and in some cases general) reliable
multicast protocol operation are identified. These goals and
challenges are resolved into a set of functional "building blocks"
that address different aspects of reliable multicast protocol
operation. It is anticipated that these building blocks will be
useful in generating different instantiations of reliable multicast
protocols. This document obsoletes RFC 3941. [STANDARDS TRACK]
This document is a product of the Reliable Multicast Transport Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute
More information about the rfc-dist