[rfc-dist] RFC 5097 on MIB for the UDP-Lite protocol
rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
Fri Jan 25 16:35:21 PST 2008
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
Title: MIB for the UDP-Lite protocol
Author: G. Renker, G. Fairhurst
Status: Standards Track
Date: January 2008
Mailbox: gerrit at erg.abdn.ac.uk,
gorry at erg.abdn.ac.uk
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udplite-mib-03.txt
This document specifies a Management Information Base (MIB) module
for the Lightweight User Datagram Protocol (UDP-Lite). It defines
a set of new MIB objects to characterise the behaviour and performance
of transport layer endpoints deploying UDP-Lite. UDP-Lite resembles
UDP, but differs from the semantics of UDP by the addition of a
single option. This adds the capability for variable-length data
checksum coverage, which can benefit a class of applications that
prefer delivery of (partially) corrupted datagram payload data in
preference to discarding the datagram. [STANDARDS TRACK]
This document is a product of the Transport Area Working Group
Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to IETF-REQUEST at IETF.ORG. Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST at RFC-EDITOR.ORG.
Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to rfc-info at RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body
help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:
To: rfc-info at RFC-EDITOR.ORG
Subject: getting rfcs
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager at RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
RFC-EDITOR at RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.
The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute
More information about the rfc-dist