[rfc-dist] RFC 5150 on Label Switched Path Stitching with Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering (GMPLS TE)
rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
Thu Feb 28 16:31:42 PST 2008
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
Title: Label Switched Path Stitching with
Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching Traffic
Engineering (GMPLS TE)
Author: A. Ayyangar, K. Kompella,
JP. Vasseur, A. Farrel
Status: Standards Track
Date: February 2008
Mailbox: arthi at juniper.net,
kireeti at juniper.net,
jpv at cisco.com, adrian at olddog.co.uk
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-stitching-06.txt
In certain scenarios, there may be a need to combine several
Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Label Switched
Paths (LSPs) such that a single end-to-end (e2e) LSP is realized and
all traffic from one constituent LSP is switched onto the next LSP.
We will refer to this as "LSP stitching", the key requirement being
that a constituent LSP not be allocated to more than one e2e LSP.
The constituent LSPs will be referred to as "LSP segments" (S-LSPs).
This document describes extensions to the existing GMPLS signaling
protocol (Resource Reservation Protocol-Traffic Engineering
(RSVP-TE)) to establish e2e LSPs created from S-LSPs, and
describes how the LSPs can be managed using the GMPLS signaling and
It may be possible to configure a GMPLS node to switch the traffic
from an LSP for which it is the egress, to another LSP for which it is
the ingress, without requiring any signaling or routing extensions
whatsoever and such that the operation is completely transparent to
other nodes. This will also result in LSP stitching in the data
plane. However, this document does not cover this scenario of LSP
stitching. [STANDARDS TRACK]
This document is a product of the Common Control and Measurement Plane Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to IETF-REQUEST at IETF.ORG. Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST at RFC-EDITOR.ORG.
Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to rfc-info at RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body
help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:
To: rfc-info at RFC-EDITOR.ORG
Subject: getting rfcs
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager at RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
RFC-EDITOR at RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.
The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute
More information about the rfc-dist