[rfc-dist] RFC 5223 on Discovering Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Servers Using the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)
rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
Tue Aug 5 15:47:37 PDT 2008
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
Title: Discovering Location-to-Service Translation (LoST)
Servers Using the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
Author: H. Schulzrinne, J. Polk,
Status: Standards Track
Date: August 2008
Mailbox: hgs+ecrit at cs.columbia.edu,
jmpolk at cisco.com,
Hannes.Tschofenig at nsn.com
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ecrit-dhc-lost-discovery-03.txt
The Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Protocol describes an XML-
based protocol for mapping service identifiers and geospatial or
civic location information to service contact Uniform Resource
Locators (URLs). LoST servers can be located anywhere, but a
placement closer to the end host, e.g., in the access network, is
desirable. In disaster situations with intermittent network
connectivity, such a LoST server placement provides benefits
regarding the resiliency of emergency service communication.
This document describes how a LoST client can discover a LoST server
using the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP). [STANDARDS TRACK]
This document is a product of the Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute
More information about the rfc-dist