[rfc-dist] RFC 4833 on Timezone Options for DHCP
rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
Mon Apr 16 11:32:35 PDT 2007
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
Title: Timezone Options for DHCP
Author: E. Lear, P. Eggert
Status: Standards Track
Date: April 2007
Mailbox: lear at cisco.com,
eggert at cs.ucla.edu
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dhc-timezone-option-05.txt
Two common ways to communicate timezone information are POSIX 1003.1
timezone strings and timezone database names. This memo specifies
DHCP options for each of those methods. The DHCPv4 time offset
option is deprecated. [STANDARDS TRACK]
This document is a product of the Dynamic Host Configuration
Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and
suggestions for improvements.Please refer to the current edition of the
Internet Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization
state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is
This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to IETF-REQUEST at IETF.ORG. Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST at RFC-EDITOR.ORG.
Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to rfc-info at RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body
help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:
To: rfc-info at RFC-EDITOR.ORG
Subject: getting rfcs
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager at RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
RFC-EDITOR at RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.
The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute
More information about the rfc-dist