[rfc-dist] RFC 3682 on The Generalized TTL Security Mechanism (GTSM)
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:48:51 -0800
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
Title: The Generalized TTL Security Mechanism (GTSM)
Author(s): V. Gill, J. Heasley, D. Meyer
Date: February 2004
Mailbox: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
I-D Tag: draft-gill-gtsh-04.txt
The use of a packet's Time to Live (TTL) (IPv4) or Hop Limit (IPv6) to
protect a protocol stack from CPU-utilization based attacks has been
proposed in many settings (see for example, RFC 2461). This document
generalizes these techniques for use by other protocols such as BGP
(RFC 1771), Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP), Bidirectional
Forwarding Detection, and Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) (RFC
3036). While the Generalized TTL Security Mechanism (GTSM) is most
effective in protecting directly connected protocol peers, it can also
provide a lower level of protection to multi-hop sessions. GTSM is
not directly applicable to protocols employing flooding mechanisms
(e.g., multicast), and use of multi-hop GTSM should be considered on a
This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Discussion and
suggestions for improvement are requested. Distribution of this memo
This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG. Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.
Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body
help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:
Subject: getting rfcs
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.
Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza
USC/Information Sciences Institute
Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version
of the RFCs.
Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; Boundary="OtherAccess"