RFC 2096

IP Forwarding Table MIB, January 1997

File formats:
icon for text file icon for PDF icon for HTML
Status:
PROPOSED STANDARD
Obsoletes:
RFC 1354
Obsoleted by:
RFC 4292
Author:
F. Baker
Stream:
IETF
Source:
ospf (rtg)

Cite this RFC: TXT  |  XML  |   BibTeX

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC2096

Discuss this RFC: Send questions or comments to the mailing list lsr@ietf.org

Other actions: Submit Errata  |  Find IPR Disclosures from the IETF  |  View History of RFC 2096


Abstract

This memo defines an update to RFC 1354. The significant difference between this MIB and RFC 1354 is the recognition (explicitly discussed but by consensus left to future work) that CIDR routes may have the same network number but different network masks. [STANDARDS-TRACK]


For the definition of Status, see RFC 2026.

For the definition of Stream, see RFC 8729.




Advanced Search