RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 1 record.

Status: Rejected (1)

RFC 7421, "Analysis of the 64-bit Boundary in IPv6 Addressing", January 2015

Source of RFC: 6man (int)

Errata ID: 5699
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Alexandre PETRESCU
Date Reported: 2019-04-19
Rejected by: Erik Kline
Date Rejected: 2021-12-18

Throughout the document, when it says:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                 B. Carpenter, Ed.
Request for Comments: 7421                             Univ. of Auckland
Category: Informational                                         T. Chown
ISSN: 2070-1721                                     Univ. of Southampton
                                                                 F. Gont
                                                  SI6 Networks / UTN-FRH
                                                                S. Jiang
                                            Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd
                                                             A. Petrescu
                                                               CEA, LIST
                                                          A. Yourtchenko
                                                                   Cisco
                                                            January 2015


It should say:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                 B. Carpenter, Ed.
Request for Comments: 7421                             Univ. of Auckland
Category: Informational                                         T. Chown
ISSN: 2070-1721                                     Univ. of Southampton
                                                                 F. Gont
                                                  SI6 Networks / UTN-FRH
                                                                S. Jiang
                                            Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd
                                                          A. Yourtchenko
                                                                   Cisco
                                                            January 2015


Notes:

For some reason I got in the group, then participated positively to the discussion, and I let myself tempted to have my name up on the first page of a published RFC; but finally, after much time and reflexion, I think I do not agree with the effects of this RFC.

I do not agree that 64bit is a boundary.

Remark: you are asking Type 'Technical' or 'Editorial'; only one choice is possible. I do not understand that. My issue is both.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
Quoting the AD at the time: "RFCs are immutable once published. Period."

For more discussion, see the mail archive thread https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/HzHbbAqaa4qquKNjaYtv3Te7IJc/

Report New Errata



Advanced Search