Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 7186, "Security Threats for the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)", April 2014

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 7985

Errata ID: 4034
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Thomas Clausen
Date Reported: 2014-07-02
Verifier Name: Adrian Farrel
Date Verified: 2014-07-20

Section 9.2 says:

   [RFC7185]  Herberg, U., Dearlove, C., and T. Clausen, "Integrity
              Protection for the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)
              and Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2
              (OLSRv2)", RFC 7185, April 2014.

It should say:

   [RFC7183]   Herberg, U., Dearlove, C., and T. Clausen, "Integrity
               Protection for the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)
               and Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2
               (OLSRv2)", RFC 7183, April 2014.

Notes:

Apparently, the wrong RFC number was cited: RFC7185 is "Rationale for the Use of Link Metrics in the Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2)"

Additionally, all references to RFC7185 in the document (Section 1 and Section 6) should read RFC7183.

Status: Rejected (1)

RFC 7186, "Security Threats for the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP)", April 2014

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 7985

Errata ID: 4035
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Thomas Clausen
Date Reported: 2014-07-03
Rejected by: Adrian Farrel
Date Rejected: 2014-07-03

Throughout the document, when it says:

[RFC7185]

It should say:

[RFC7183]

Notes:

Related to errata 4034, which corrects the reference in the references section, the actual citation keys (which are RFC7185 in the document) should be corrected to [RFC7183] also.

Not quite sure if this should be a separate errata or the two should be combined?
--VERIFIER NOTES--
This is rejected as a duplicate of report 4034. That report can be used to capture all of the information required.

Report New Errata