errata logo graphic

Found 1 record.

Status: Rejected (1)

RFC6735, "Diameter Priority Attribute-Value Pairs", October 2012

Source of RFC: dime (ops)

Errata ID: 3859

Status: Rejected
Type: Technical

Reported By: Hyungho Kim
Date Reported: 2014-01-02
Rejected by: Benoit Claise
Date Rejected: 2014-03-18

Section 5.1 says:

ALRP-Value                             617  3.4.2     Unsigned32

It should say:

ALRP-Value                             617  3.4.2     Unsigned8

Notes:

Conflicts with section 3.4.2, which says "The ALRP-Value AVP (AVP Code 617) is of type Unsigned8"
--VERIFIER NOTES--
In accordance with the DIME chairs: The introduction of new data types would imply a new version of the Base protocol..

"In the event that a new Basic AVP Data Format is needed,
a new version of this RFC MUST be created."

A bis document is required.


Report New Errata