Found 2 records.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC5681, "TCP Congestion Control", September 2009

Errata ID: 2074

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Herbie Robinson
Date Reported: 2010-03-15
Held for Document Update by: Lars Eggert

Section 3.1 says:

   A detailed rationale and discussion of the IW setting is provided in
   [RFC3390].

It should say:

   A detailed rationale and discussion of the IW setting is provided in
   [RFC3390].  The IW value for the case when (SMSS > 1095 bytes) and (SMSS <= 
   2190 bytes) is changed from RFC3390.  The new definition will keep early 
   values of cwnd at a multiple of SMSS and avoid transmitting partial segments.

Notes:

Hopefully, I surmised the reason for the change correctly.

Status: Rejected (1)

RFC5681, "TCP Congestion Control", September 2009

Errata ID: 2269

Status: Rejected
Type: Technical

Reported By: Nikolai Malykh
Date Reported: 2010-05-18
Rejected by: Lars Eggert
Date Rejected: 2010-05-20

Section 7 says:

   The description of fast retransmit and fast recovery has been
   clarified, and the use of Limited Transmit [RFC3042] is now
   recommended.

It should say:

   The description of fast retransmit and fast recovery has been
   clarified.

Notes:

Really using of Limited Transmit [RFC3042] is not recommended anywhere in RFC 5681.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
WG consensus is that this errata is incorrect.

Report New Errata