RFC Errata
Found 8 records.
Status: Verified (7)
RFC 5473, "Reducing Redundancy in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Reports", March 2009
Source of RFC: ipfix (ops)
Errata ID: 2877
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Paul Aitken
Date Reported: 2011-08-01
Verifier Name: Dan Romascanu
Date Verified: 2011-08-02
Section A.2 says:
o The Class of Service field: ClassOfServiceIPv4 in [RFC5102], with
a type of 5 and a length of 1 octet.
It should say:
o The Class of Service field: ipClassOfService in [RFC5102], with
a type of 5 and a length of 1 octet.
Notes:
s/ClassOfServiceIPv4/ipClassOfService/ per IANA IPFIX registry, #5.
Errata ID: 2878
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Paul Aitken
Date Reported: 2011-08-01
Verifier Name: Dan Romascanu
Date Verified: 2011-08-02
Section A.2 says:
In this example, using IPFIX to export the measurement data for each received packet, 38 bytes have to be transferred (sourceAddressV4=4, destinationAddressV4=4, classOfServiceV4=1, protocolIdentifier=1, sourceTransportPort=2, destinationTransportPort=2, observationTimeMilliseconds=8, digestHashValue=8, ipTotalLength=8). Without considering the IPFIX protocol overhead, a Flow of 1000 packets produces 38000 bytes of measurement data. Using the proposed optimization, each packet produces an export of only 28 bytes (observationTimeMilliseconds=8, digestHashValue=8, ipTotalLength=8, commonPropertiesID=4). The export of the Flow information produces 18 bytes (sourceAddressV4=4, destinationAddressV4=4, classOfServiceV4=1, protocolIdentifier=1, sourceTransportPort=2, destinationTransportPort=2, commonPropertiesID=4). For a Flow of 1000 packets, this sums to 28018 bytes. This is a decrease of more than 26 percent.
It should say:
In this example, using IPFIX to export the measurement data for each received packet, 38 bytes have to be transferred (sourceIPv4Address=4, destinationIPv4Address=4, ipClassOfService=1, protocolIdentifier=1, sourceTransportPort=2, destinationTransportPort=2, observationTimeMilliseconds=8, digestHashValue=8, ipTotalLength=8). Without considering the IPFIX protocol overhead, a Flow of 1000 packets produces 38000 bytes of measurement data. Using the proposed optimization, each packet produces an export of only 28 bytes (observationTimeMilliseconds=8, digestHashValue=8, ipTotalLength=8, commonPropertiesID=4). The export of the Flow information produces 18 bytes (sourceIPv4Address=4, destinationIPv4Address=4, ipClassOfService=1, protocolIdentifier=1, sourceTransportPort=2, destinationTransportPort=2, commonPropertiesID=4). For a Flow of 1000 packets, this sums to 28018 bytes. This is a decrease of more than 26 percent.
Notes:
s/sourceAddressV4/sourceIPv4Address/
s/destinationAddressV4/destinationIPv4Address/
s/classOfServiceV4=1/ipClassOfService/
- twice each.
Names are per IANA's IPFIX registry.
Errata ID: 2880
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Paul Aitken
Date Reported: 2011-08-01
Verifier Name: Dan Romascanu
Date Verified: 2011-08-02
Section Figure 15 says:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Set ID = 3 | Length = 40 octets |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Template ID = 256 | Field Count = 7 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Scope Field count = 1 |0| commonPropertiesID = 137 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Scope 1 Field Length = 4 |0| sourceIPv4Address = 8 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 4 |0| destinationIPv4Address = 12 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 4 |0| classOfServiceIPv4 = 5 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 1 |0| protocolIdentifier = 4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 1 |0| transportSourcePort = 7 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 2 |0|transportDestinationPort = 11|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
It should say:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Set ID = 3 | Length = 40 octets |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Template ID = 256 | Field Count = 7 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Scope Field count = 1 |0| commonPropertiesID = 137 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Scope 1 Field Length = 4 |0| sourceIPv4Address = 8 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 4 |0| destinationIPv4Address = 12 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 4 |0| ipClassOfService = 5 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 1 |0| protocolIdentifier = 4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 1 |0| transportSourcePort = 7 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 2 |0|transportDestinationPort = 11|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Notes:
s/classOfServiceIPv4/ipClassOfService/
Also, fix the alignment of the bit position numbering at the top of the figure.
Errata ID: 2886
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Paul Aitken
Date Reported: 2011-08-01
Verifier Name: Dan Romascanu
Date Verified: 2011-08-02
Section (all) says:
commonPropertiesID
It should say:
commonPropertiesId
Notes:
This doc consistently uses "commonPropertiesID" when the field defined in [RFC5101] and IANA's IPFIX registry is "commonPropertiesId".
Note that some of the other errata on this RFC also contain this incorrect usage.
Errata ID: 2893
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Paul Aitken
Date Reported: 2011-08-01
Verifier Name: Dan Romascanu
Date Verified: 2011-08-02
Section A.1 says:
inOctetDeltaCount
It should say:
octetDeltaCount
Notes:
s/inOctetDeltaCount/octetDeltaCount/ (three times)
- including figure 10.
Per [RFC5102] and IANA's IPFIX registry, the correct name is "octetDeltaCount".
Errata ID: 2894
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Paul Aitken
Date Reported: 2011-08-01
Verifier Name: Dan Romascanu
Date Verified: 2011-08-02
Section A.1 says:
inPacketDeltaCount
It should say:
packetDeltaCount
Notes:
s/inPacketDeltaCount/packetDeltaCount/ (three times)
- including figure 10.
Per [RFC5102] and IANA's IPFIX registry, the correct name is "packetDeltaCount".
Errata ID: 2908
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Paul Aitken
Date Reported: 2011-08-01
Verifier Name: Dan Romascanu
Date Verified: 2011-08-02
Section Figure 15 says:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Set ID = 3 | Length = 40 octets |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Template ID = 256 | Field Count = 7 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Scope Field count = 1 |0| commonPropertiesID = 137 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Scope 1 Field Length = 4 |0| sourceIPv4Address = 8 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 4 |0| destinationIPv4Address = 12 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 4 |0| classOfServiceIPv4 = 5 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 1 |0| protocolIdentifier = 4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 1 |0| transportSourcePort = 7 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 2 |0|transportDestinationPort = 11|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
It should say:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Set ID = 3 | Length = 40 octets |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Template ID = 256 | Field Count = 7 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Scope Field count = 1 |0| commonPropertiesID = 137 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Scope 1 Field Length = 4 |0| sourceIPv4Address = 8 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 4 |0| destinationIPv4Address = 12 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 4 |0| classOfServiceIPv4 = 5 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 1 |0| protocolIdentifier = 4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 1 |0| sourceTransportPort = 7 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 2 |0|destinationTransportPort = 11|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Field Length = 2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Notes:
s/transportSourcePort/sourceTransportPort/
s/transportDestinationPort/destinationTransportPort/
Per RFC5102 and IANA's IPFIX registry, the correct names are "sourceTransportPort" and "destinationTransportPort".
Errata 2880 also relates to this figure.
Status: Held for Document Update (1)
RFC 5473, "Reducing Redundancy in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Reports", March 2009
Source of RFC: ipfix (ops)
Errata ID: 2911
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Gerhard Muenz
Date Reported: 2011-08-02
Held for Document Update by: Dan Romascanu
Section 10 says:
The authors would like to thank Guido Pohl for initiating this work and for his contribution to early versions of this document. Thanks also to Andrew Johnson, Gehrard Muenz, Brian Trammell, and Paul Aitken for their comments and feedback.
It should say:
The authors would like to thank Guido Pohl for initiating this work and for his contribution to early versions of this document. Thanks also to Andrew Johnson, Gerhard Muenz, Brian Trammell, and Paul Aitken for their comments and feedback.
Notes:
s/Gehrard/Gerhard/
Typo