Found 1 record.
Errata ID: 1326
Status: Held for Document Update
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-02-17
Held for Document Update by: Dan Romascanu
Throughout the document, when it says:
a) header b) headers c) Header
It should say:
a) header field b) header fields c) Header Field
As a Standards Track document, RFC 5090 should use established
IETF standard terminology, and not fall back to common sluggish
and confusing terminology. Concise Ref.: RFC 4249, Section 3.1.1.
There are 24 instances of case a) throughout the RFC;
only Section 3.20 makes proper use of the IETF standard
terminology; case b) occurs twice in the RFC;
case c) applies to the title of Section 2.1.3.
Report New Errata