errata logo graphic

Found 3 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC5088, "OSPF Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery", January 2008

Source of RFC: pce (rtg)

Errata ID: 1266

Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-01-13
Verifier Name: Adrian Farrel
Date Verified: 2010-01-02

Section 4.4, 2nd par says:

|  A PCED sub-TLV may include several NEIG-PCE-DOMAIN sub-TLVs when the
   PCE can compute paths towards several neighbor PCE-Domains.

It should say:

|  A PCED TLV may include several NEIG-PCE-DOMAIN sub-TLVs when the PCE
   can compute paths towards several neighbor PCE-Domains.

Notes:

In OSPF, PCED is a TLV, not a sub-TLV, as clearly stated
in this RFC. All other occurrences of 'PCED' in the RFC
indeed correctly use 'TLV'.


Status: Held for Document Update (2)

RFC5088, "OSPF Protocol Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery", January 2008

Source of RFC: pce (rtg)

Errata ID: 1264

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-01-13
Held for Document Update by: Adrian Farrel

Section 2 (p.4/bot.) says:

   TLV: Type-Length-Variable data encoding.

It should say:

   TLV: Type-Length-Value data encoding.

Notes:

Wrong expansion of acronym;
cf. RFC 4940 and RFC-Ed. file "abbrev.expansion.txt"


Errata ID: 1267

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2008-01-13
Held for Document Update by: Adrian Farrel

Section 9.6, line 1 says:

         ... PCED TLV, may have ...

It should say:

         ... PCED TLV may have ...

Notes:

Spurious comma, distorting the grammar.

>>> This issue is not present in the equivalent text of
RFC 5089, which has been published together with this RFC.

This report is primarily intended as a kind of quality control feedback.

Another typographical flaw of similar 'severity' appears in Section 11.2,
where punctuation has been orphaned into the 3rd line of the '[PCEP]'
entry:

[PCEP] Vasseur, JP., Ed., and JL. Le Roux, Ed., "Path
Computation Element (PCE) communication Protocol (PCEP)
| ", Work in Progress, November 2007.
^^

>>> This latter issue also is present in RFC 5089.
and perhaps does not deserve


Report New Errata