RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 2827, "Network Ingress Filtering: Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source Address Spoofing", May 2000

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP
Area Assignment: sec

Errata ID: 2244

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Justin Pryzby
Date Reported: 2010-04-28
Held for Document Update by: Sean Turner

Section 1 says:

By mentioning the method, he was concerned about encouraging it's use.

It should say:

By mentioning the method, he was concerned about encouraging its use.

Notes:

/it's/ s/'//

Status: Rejected (1)

RFC 2827, "Network Ingress Filtering: Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source Address Spoofing", May 2000

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP
Area Assignment: sec

Errata ID: 372

Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Craig A. Huegen
Date Reported: 2002-11-20
Rejected by: Sean Turner
Date Rejected: 2011-02-23

Section 9 says:

   [9]  Thanks to: Craig Huegen; See:
        http://www.quadrunner.com/~chuegen/smurf.txt.

It should say:

   [9]  Thanks to: Craig Huegen; See:
        http://www.pentics.net/denial-of-service/white-papers/smurf.html.

Notes:

Tried to preserve the old URL, but could not.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
According to the RFC editor:

The URL was correct at the time of publication, so we don't consider
this an erratum. That is, we don't believe errata should be used
to update things that were true at the time of publication. I think
using the errata in this way muddies the system.

Additionally, using Google search
on "Craig Huegen" returns a link to "Index of Craig Huegen's
Denial-of-Service papers and presentations", which seems sufficient.

Report New Errata



Search RFCs
Advanced Search
×