RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 1 record.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 8460, "SMTP TLS Reporting", September 2018

Source of RFC: uta (art)

Errata ID: 5889
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Scott Kitterman
Date Reported: 2019-10-31
Held for Document Update by: Alexey Melnikov
Date Held: 2020-03-25

Section 6.7 says:

Item is missing entirely

It should say:

6.7 DKIM Service Type

This document registers a new DKIM Service Type in the DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Parameters registry:

Service Type name: tlsrpt

Reference: RFC 8460

Status Active

Notes:

The new service type is discussed in Section 3, so it should have been added to the registry. It's an IETF Review required registry, not Specification Required, so this can (and should) be addressed in terms at least of the registry now.

Alexey: Murray wrote:

I would guess we can't rectify this oversight via the errata system. What got IETF Review was the need for the registration, but not the registration itself.

I imagine this should either be done through DISPATCH (which is chartered to do minor housekeeping things like this) or through an AD-sponsored document that contains only the registration.

Report New Errata