RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (2)

RFC 8311, "Relaxing Restrictions on Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Experimentation", January 2018

Source of RFC: tsvwg (tsv)

Errata ID: 5399
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: David Black
Date Reported: 2018-06-19
Verifier Name: Spencer Dawkins
Date Verified: 2018-11-16

Section 7 says:

(n/a, this errata adds an additional IANA Consideration)

It should say:

To reflect the experimental use of ECT(1) envisioned by this memo,
IANA has added the following footnote to the ECN Field registry
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/dscp-registry/
dscp-registry.xhtml#ecn-field>:

ECT(1) is for experimental use only [RFC8311, Section 4.2]

Notes:

The Corrected Text is written as if IANA has already added the footnote, which will be done upon approval of this errata, citing this approved errata as justification.

(From Spencer - this could have been Held for Document Update, but I think Verified is just about as correct)

Errata ID: 5649
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Bob Briscoe
Date Reported: 2019-03-10
Verifier Name: Mirja Kühlewind
Date Verified: 2019-03-11

Section 3. says:

see Appendix B.1 of [ECN-L4S].

It should say:

see Appendix C.1 of [ECN-L4S].

Notes:

At the end of Section 8. there is another reference to the same information in the same Appendix:

See Appendix C.1 of [ECN-L4S] for discussion of alternatives to the
ECN nonce.

So we have to change one to be consistent with the other. Let's use C.1, because that is the current number of the appendix in the relevant draft.

Report New Errata