RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (2)

RFC 8231, "Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE", September 2017

Source of RFC: pce (rtg)

Errata ID: 5376
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Hari Krushna Kotni
Date Reported: 2018-06-01
Verifier Name: Deborah Brungard
Date Verified: 2018-06-05

Section 7.2 says:

In case of SRP-ID-number wrapping, the last
   SRP-ID-number before the wrapping MUST be explicitly acknowledged, to
   avoid a situation where SRP-ID-numbers remain unacknowledged after
   the wrap.  This means that the PCC may need to issue two PCUpd
   messages on detecting a wrap.

It should say:

In case of SRP-ID-number wrapping, the last
   SRP-ID-number before the wrapping MUST be explicitly acknowledged, to
   avoid a situation where SRP-ID-numbers remain unacknowledged after
   the wrap.  This means that the PCC may need to issue two PCRpt
   messages on detecting a wrap.

Notes:

incase of srp id wrap, once PCC detects it, PCC needs to issue PCRpt message not PCUpd message.

Errata ID: 5492
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Upendra Singh
Date Reported: 2018-09-05
Verifier Name: Deborah Brungard
Date Verified: 2019-02-11

Section 6.1 says:

Under section 6.1, PCRpt message is defined.
In definition of path,

    Where:
      <path>::= <intended-path>
                [<actual-attribute-list><actual-path>]
                <intended-attribute-list>


It should say:

Where:
      <path>::= <intended-path>
                [<actual-attribute-list><actual-path>]
                [<intended-attribute-list>]


Notes:

The change aligns the RBNF with the following text in the document (section 6.1) -

Note that the intended-attribute-list is optional and
thus may be omitted.

Report New Errata