RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Held for Document Update (2)

RFC 7183, "Integrity Protection for the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP) and Optimized Link State Routing Protocol Version 2 (OLSRv2)", April 2014

Source of RFC: manet (rtg)

Errata ID: 4397

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Jiazi
Date Reported: 2015-06-22
Held for Document Update by: Alvaro Retana
Date Held: 2015-06-22

Section 4 says:

Generation of TIMESTAMP Message TLVs (as defined in [RFC7182]) for
      inclusion in an outgoing message.  An implementation of [RFC6130]
      and [RFC7181] MAY use more than one ICV TLV in a message, but it
      MUST NOT use the same type extensio

It should say:

Generation of TIMESTAMP Message TLVs (as defined in [RFC7182]) for
      inclusion in an outgoing message.  An implementation of [RFC6130]
      and [RFC7181] MAY use more than one TIMESTAMP TLV in a message
      , but it MUST NOT use the same type extensio

Notes:

We are only talking about TIMESTAMP TLV in this paragraph.
I think it's an error when copying the text from the previous paragraph.

Errata ID: 5144

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Denis Ovsienko
Date Reported: 2017-10-04
Held for Document Update by: Alvaro Retana
Date Held: 2017-11-06

Section 8.1.3 says:

   is contained in message.  As an attacker cannot modify the content of
   this timestamp (as it is protected by the identity check value), an
   attacker cannot replay messages after this time.  Within this time

It should say:

   is contained in message.  As an attacker cannot modify the content of
   this timestamp (as it is protected by the integrity check value), an
   attacker cannot replay messages after this time.  Within this time

Notes:

Integrity check value (ICV) is the means of protection in this document.

Report New Errata