RFC Errata
Found 2 records.
Status: Verified (2)
RFC 5657, "Guidance on Interoperation and Implementation Reports for Advancement to Draft Standard", September 2009
Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUPArea Assignment: gen
Errata ID: 1900
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-10-02
Verifier Name: Russ Housley
Date Verified: 2010-04-12
Section 5.5 says:
| [RFC4234] progressed from Proposed Standard through Draft Standard | to Standard and is obsoleted by [RFC5234].
It should say:
| [RFC4234] progressed from Proposed Standard to Draft Standard and | then has been obsoleted by the Full Standard [RFC5234].
Notes:
Clear description of historical timeline.
Errata ID: 1901
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-10-02
Verifier Name: Russ Housley
Date Verified: 2010-04-12
Section 6.2 says:
[[ second paragraph of Section 6.2 ]] VRFY and EXPN commands are often not implemented or are disabled. This does not pose an interoperability problem for SMTP because | EXPN is an optional features and its support is never relied on. [...] ^^
It should say:
VRFY and EXPN commands are often not implemented or are disabled. This does not pose an interoperability problem for SMTP because | EXPN is an optional feature and its support is never relied on. [...] ^
Notes:
Correct typo.