RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 5632, "Comcast's ISP Experiences in a Proactive Network Provider Participation for P2P (P4P) Technical Trial", September 2009

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP

Errata ID: 1948

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-11-26
Held for Document Update by: Lisa Dusseault

Section 7, 2nd para says:

   The experiment did show that an ISP can improve performance without
   exposing fine-grained details about network structure, which might
   otherwise be a security concern (see Section 3.1 (P4P Fine Grain) and
|  Section 3.2 (P4P Coarse Grain).  [...]
                                 ^

It should say:

   The experiment did show that an ISP can improve performance without
   exposing fine-grained details about network structure, which might
   otherwise be a security concern (see Section 3.1 (P4P Fine Grain) and
|  Section 3.2 (P4P Coarse Grain)).  [...]
                                 ^

Notes:

Rationale: Mismatch of parentheses.

Status: Rejected (1)

RFC 5632, "Comcast's ISP Experiences in a Proactive Network Provider Participation for P2P (P4P) Technical Trial", September 2009

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP

Errata ID: 1949

Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-11-26
Rejected by: Lisa Dusseault
Date Rejected: 2009-12-01

Section 9 says:

   [SIGCOMM]  Xie, H., Yang, Y., Krishnamurthy, A., Liu, Y., and A.
              Silberschatz, "ACM SIGCOMM 2008 - P4P: Provider Portal for
|             Applications", Association for Computing Machinery SIGCOMM
              2008 Proceedings, August 2008, [..]

It should say:

   [SIGCOMM]  Xie, H., Yang, Y., Krishnamurthy, A., Liu, Y., and A.
              Silberschatz, "ACM SIGCOMM 2008 - P4P: Provider Portal for
|             Peer-to-Peer Applications", Association for Computing
|             Machinery, SIGCOMM 2008 Proceedings, August 2008, [..]

Notes:

Rationale: word omission.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
The authors checked the published title and confirmed it.

Report New Errata



Search RFCs
Advanced Search
×