RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 3 records.

Status: Verified (2)

RFC 5491, "GEOPRIV Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) Usage Clarification, Considerations, and Recommendations", March 2009

Source of RFC: geopriv (rai)

Errata ID: 1888

Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Martin Thomson
Date Reported: 2009-09-21
Verifier Name: Cullen Jennings
Date Verified: 2009-11-30

Section 3 says:

The PIDF format provides for an unbounded number of <tuple>,
<device>, and <person> elements.  Each of these elements contains a
single <status> element that may contain more than one <geopriv>
element as a child.  

It should say:

The PIDF format provides for an unbounded number of <tuple>,
<device>, and <person> elements.  Each of these elements may
contain more than one <geopriv> element.  

Notes:

<status> only exists in <tuple> [RFC3863], not <device> or <person> [RFC4479]. The proposed text removes the problem.

I believe that it was only late that someone pointed out that <status> only applied to <tuple>; this sentence obviously got missed in the edit.

Errata ID: 1951

Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Martin Thomson
Date Reported: 2009-11-30
Verifier Name: Cullen Jennings
Date Verified: 2009-11-30

Section 5.2.2 says:

                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.422</gml:pos> <!--A-->
                     <gml:pos>43.111 -73.322</gml:pos> <!--F-->
                     <gml:pos>43.111 -73.222</gml:pos> <!--E-->
                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.122</gml:pos> <!--D-->
                     <gml:pos>43.411 -73.222</gml:pos> <!--C-->
                     <gml:pos>43.411 -73.322</gml:pos> <!--B-->
                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.422</gml:pos> <!--A-->

It should say:

                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.422</gml:pos> <!--A-->
                     <gml:pos>43.111 -73.322</gml:pos> <!--B-->
                     <gml:pos>43.111 -73.222</gml:pos> <!--C-->
                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.122</gml:pos> <!--D-->
                     <gml:pos>43.411 -73.222</gml:pos> <!--E-->
                     <gml:pos>43.411 -73.322</gml:pos> <!--F-->
                     <gml:pos>43.311 -73.422</gml:pos> <!--A-->

Notes:

The points in Figure 7 are correct (i.e., they are in a counter-clockwise direction) but the comment labels are in the wrong order.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 5491, "GEOPRIV Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) Usage Clarification, Considerations, and Recommendations", March 2009

Source of RFC: geopriv (rai)

Errata ID: 1749

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-03-30
Held for Document Update by: Cullen Jennings

Section 5.2.5,pg.20 says:

     <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
               xmlns:gp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10"
               xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
               xmlns:gs="http://www.opengis.net/pidflo/1.0"
               entity="pres:paul@somecell.example.com">
       <tuple id="arcband">
         <status>
           <gp:geopriv>
             <gp:location-info>
               <gs:ArcBand srsName="urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326">
                 <gml:pos>-43.5723 153.21760</gml:pos>
                 <gs:innerRadius uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">
                   3594
                 </gs:innerRadius>
                 <gs:outerRadius uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">
                   4148
                 </gs:outerRadius>
                 <gs:startAngle uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9102">
                   20
                 </gs:startAngle>
                 <gs:openingAngle uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9102">
|                  20
                 </gs:openingAngle>
               </gs:ArcBand>
             </gp:location-info>
             <gp:usage-rules/>
             <gp:method>TA-NMR</gp:method>
           </gp:geopriv>
         </status>
         <timestamp>2007-06-22T20:57:29Z</timestamp>
       </tuple>
     </presence>

                 Figure 12: PIDF-LO Containing an Arc Band

   An important note to make on the arc band is that the center point
|  used in the definition of the shape is not included in resulting
   enclosed area, and that Target may be anywhere in the defined area of
   the arc band.

It should say:

     <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf"
               xmlns:gp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10"
               xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
               xmlns:gs="http://www.opengis.net/pidflo/1.0"
               entity="pres:paul@somecell.example.com">
       <tuple id="arcband">
         <status>
           <gp:geopriv>
             <gp:location-info>
               <gs:ArcBand srsName="urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326">
                 <gml:pos>-43.5723 153.21760</gml:pos>
                 <gs:innerRadius uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">
                   3594
                 </gs:innerRadius>
                 <gs:outerRadius uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9001">
                   4148
                 </gs:outerRadius>
                 <gs:startAngle uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9102">
                   20
                 </gs:startAngle>
                 <gs:openingAngle uom="urn:ogc:def:uom:EPSG::9102">
|                  120
                 </gs:openingAngle>
               </gs:ArcBand>
             </gp:location-info>
             <gp:usage-rules/>
             <gp:method>TA-NMR</gp:method>
           </gp:geopriv>
         </status>
         <timestamp>2007-06-22T20:57:29Z</timestamp>
       </tuple>
     </presence>

                 Figure 12: PIDF-LO Containing an Arc Band

   An important note to make on the arc band is that the center point
|  used in the definition of the shape is not included in the resulting
   enclosed area, and that Target may be anywhere in the defined area of
   the arc band.

Notes:

a) The openingAngle in Figure 12 does not match the scenario
depicted in Figure 11 and described in the text on page 19.
==> s/20/120/

b) Missing article.

Hint (saving an additional Errata Note):
In Section 5.2.8 (2nd line on pg.24), another article is missing:
s/floors of building/floors of a building/

Report New Errata