RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 5458, "Security Requirements for the Unidirectional Lightweight Encapsulation (ULE) Protocol", March 2009

Source of RFC: ipdvb (int)

Errata ID: 1746

Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-03-30
Verifier Name: Ted Lemon
Date Verified: 2013-03-16

Section 2 says:

[[ at the bottom of page 5 / top of page 6 ]]

   TS: Transport Stream [ISO-MPEG2].  A method of transmission at the
   MPEG-2 layer using TS Packets; it represents Layer 2 of the ISO/OSI
   reference model.  See also TS Logical Channel and TS Multiplex.
                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

<< page break >>

   TS Multiplex: In this document, ...


It should say:

   TS: Transport Stream [ISO-MPEG2].  A method of transmission at the
   MPEG-2 layer using TS Packets; it represents Layer 2 of the ISO/OSI
   reference model.  See also TS Logical Channel and TS Multiplex.

   TS Logical Channel: Transport Stream Logical Channel.  In this
   document, this term identifies a channel at the MPEG-2 level
   [ISO-MPEG2].  It exists at level 2 of the ISO/OSI reference model.
   All packets sent over a TS Logical Channel carry the same PID value
   (this value is unique within a specific TS Multiplex).  The term
   "Stream" is defined in MPEG-2 [ISO-MPEG2] to describe the content
   carried by a specific TS Logical Channel (see ULE Stream).  Some PID
   values are reserved (by MPEG-2) for specific signalling.  Other
   standards (e.g., ATSC, DVB) also reserve specific PID values.

   TS Multiplex: In this document, ...


Notes:

The quoted keyword explanation for "TS Logical Channel"
is missing in Section 2.

Authors/Verifiers:
Please restore the entry and fill in the missing Corrected Text.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 5458, "Security Requirements for the Unidirectional Lightweight Encapsulation (ULE) Protocol", March 2009

Source of RFC: ipdvb (int)

Errata ID: 1747

Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-03-30
Held for Document Update by: Brian Haberman

Section 10.2, pg.17 says:

   [GSE]       TS 102 606, "Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Generic
               Stream Encapsulation (GSE) Protocol, "European
|              Telecommunication Standards, Institute (ETSI), 2007.
                                          ^^

It should say:

   [GSE]       TS 102 606, "Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Generic
               Stream Encapsulation (GSE) Protocol, "European
|              Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI), 2007.
                                          ^

Notes:

Rationale: distorting spurious comma.

The immediately preceding entry ('[ETSI-DAT]') is correct
in this respect, but it lacks the publication year.

Report New Errata



Search RFCs
Advanced Search
×