RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 3208, "PGM Reliable Transport Protocol Specification", December 2001

Source of RFC: Legacy
Area Assignment: tsv

Errata ID: 323
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported By: Lorenzo Vicisano
Date Reported: 2002-09-17

Section 8 says:

   Options:

      This field encodes binary indications of the presence and
      significance of any options.  It also directly encodes some
      options.

      bit 0 set => One or more Option Extensions are present

      bit 1 set => One or more Options are network-significant

         Note that this bit is clear when OPT_FRAGMENT and/or
         OPT_JOIN are the only options present.

      bit 6 set => Packet is a parity packet for a transmission
	 group
      of variable sized packets (OPT_VAR_PKTLEN).  Only present
	 when
      OPT_PARITY is also present.

      bit 7 set => Packet is a parity packet (OPT_PARITY)

      Bits are numbered here from left (0 = MSB) to right (7 =
	 LSB).

      All the other options (option extensions) are encoded in
      extensions to the PGM header.

It should say:

   Options:

      This field encodes binary indications of the presence and
      significance of any options.  It also directly encodes some
      options.

      bit 7 set => One or more Option Extensions are present

      bit 6 set => One or more Options are network-significant

         Note that this bit is clear when OPT_FRAGMENT and/or
         OPT_JOIN are the only options present.

      bit 1 set => Packet is a parity packet for a transmission
	 group
      of variable sized packets (OPT_VAR_PKTLEN).  Only present
	 when
      OPT_PARITY is also present.

      bit 0 set => Packet is a parity packet (OPT_PARITY)

      Bits are numbered here from left (0 = MSB) to right (7 =
	 LSB).

      All the other options (option extensions) are encoded in
      extensions to the PGM header.

Status: Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 3208, "PGM Reliable Transport Protocol Specification", December 2001

Source of RFC: Legacy
Area Assignment: tsv

Errata ID: 1945
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alessandro Spinella
Date Reported: 2009-11-23
Held for Document Update by: Wes Eddy
Date Held: 2011-08-17

Section 1.2.5. says:

If receivers are several hops
   removed from the first PGM network element, the efficacy of NAK
   suppression may degrade.

It should say:

If receivers are several hops
   away from the first PGM network element, the efficacy of NAK
   suppression may degrade.

Notes:

This is simply a stylistic suggestion in the wording choice.

Report New Errata